Should Ron Paul be President? Concerning Paul’s views on healthcare, war on drugs, war on terrorism, economy, etc. Would he be an improvement from Obama?

No, Ron Paul should absolutely NOT be President. And I urge you to read the following in order to see why he shouldn’t be president.

Too few people know that Ron Paul has in the last several years “remade” himself into this supposedly moderate civil libertarian. Too few people are aware of his very real, and very bad, links to all manner of white nationalists and very fringe, irrational, and frankly paranoid groups and conspiracy theories (I use the term to mean the common-use understanding of the phrase, because it absolutely applies here) about secret international cabals plotting to take over the USA, be it a Mexican invasion to seize the southern U.S. or U.N. troops commanded by “international/European bankers” (very transparent and common anti-Semitic code for “Jews”) who will seize our guns and create a one-world religion and government, a big race war that will seek to enslave white citizens, and other such dangerous, far-right extremist ramblings.

Here is a sampling of information about Ron Paul that I like to share, to make the factual and undeniable case that he is indeed a racist who embraces many seriously delusional, dangerous, and hateful views.

There are some of the more fanatical and extreme supporters who will refuse to even look at or believe the documentation about Ron Paul’s views, his past, his votes, his links to extremist white nationalist groups and conspiracy theories, etc, and who will just not even address any of it but instead outright dismiss it as “lies/slander/whatever” or claim it’s a conspiracy against him (that apparently includes a clone of him who went back in time to give interviews taking credit for writing those inflammatory newsletters and even went into detail to defend them and explain the “research” he did to “prove” his remarks about black people etc). But hopefully the vast majority of folks, who are rational and intelligent supporters of progressive policies and support civil liberties, will realize they simply weren’t aware of these facts because these things rarely get covered in the media and Ron Paul’s campaign and most vocal supporters have just been very good at shouting it down and denying it.

Anyway, here is the text from a document I keep on hand to send to friends and family and others when they ask for information/evidence/whatever about Ron Paul’s true nature.

http://www.quora.com/Ron-Paul/Should-Ron-Paul-be-President

A look at Ron Paul’s controversial past. Texas presidential candidate with libertarian views has taken controversial positions on issues from immigration to AIDS.

WASHINGTON — Texas Rep. Ron Paul’s fervent opposition to the Iraq war and his denunciations of Big Government have made him the Internet darling of the 2008 presidential campaign and have earned him more than $10 million in contributions.

Less known to Paul’s many Internet-driven supporters are earlier writings and speeches by the Lake Jackson Republican in which he made incendiary comments about African-Americans, immigration, AIDS patients and alleged victims of sexual harassment.

“Why don’t they quit once the so-called harassment starts?” Paul wrote in a 1988 book, Freedom Under Siege.

In 1997, Paul took issue with the concept of global warming, arguing “the temperatures are getting cooler, on the average.”

Ten years earlier, in 1987, he wrote that the United States should not have a national immigration policy and “should welcome everyone who wants to come here and work.”

While some supporters say Paul’s controversial views would not affect their support for his presidential run, some academics begged to differ.

‘Off-the-wall views’

Paul, a 10-term congressman who was the 1988 Libertarian Party nominee for president, has emerged from the rear of the 2008 presidential pack to reach double digits in some polls in New Hampshire, the first state to hold a presidential primary. The early front-runners have avoided clashing with him because they did not see him as a threat to win the nomination.

But if Paul continues to gain in the polls, “the more likely that some of his off-the-wall views will get known,” said Bruce Buchanan, a University of Texas political science professor.

Paul’s campaign spokesman, Jesse Benton, said in response to questions that criticisms of the congressman’s writings were recycled political attacks.

Benton said Paul has changed his position on immigration over the past two decades, now backing government action such as building a fence on the border. Paul still opposes the Kyoto climate change protocol, but now believes “temperatures are rising in some places and falling in others, and that human activity plays a role,” the spokesman said.

Paul outlined many of his ideas in his current weekly column, “Texas Straight Talk.” He also gave numerous speeches and wrote or co-wrote 11 books.

Many opinions

Among other provocative stands, Paul has advocated decriminalizing drugs, returning to the gold standard and eliminating the Federal Reserve, CIA, IRS and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

More recently he slammed government bureaucrats for using the Sept. 11 attacks as “an excuse to seize police powers sought for decades.” And he labeled the neoconservatives who built the case for invading Iraq “Trotskyites.”

Earlier this year, Paul said the Civil War did not have to be fought, arguing that there were better ways of ending slavery. “We could have paid for the slaves and released them,” he said on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher.

Some of Paul’s most provocative stands are included in his book Freedom Under Siege, published in 1988. In it, Paul took issue with people seeking government redress based on their affiliation with certain groups.

In one chapter, he questioned those employees who claim sexual harassment is a violation of their rights.

“Employee rights are said to be valid when employers pressure employees into sexual activity,” he wrote. “Why don’t they quit once the so-called harassment starts? Obviously the morals of the harasser cannot be defended, but how can the harassee escape some responsibility for the problem? Seeking protection under civil rights legislation is hardily acceptable.”

The Paul campaign did not respond to questions about the passage.

AIDS stance explained

In the same chapter, Paul also singled out people with AIDS, saying they “demand health care and scream AIDS ‘discrimination’ if insurance companies claim they have a right to refuse to issue a policy to someone already infected with the AIDS virus.”

“The rights of the insurance company owners are not considered, while legislation is passed forcing insurance companies to provide insurance demanded by the victims,” he wrote.

Campaign spokesman Benton said Paul, an obstetrician, believes “government mandates on insurance companies always push up costs and drive down quality.”

An August 1992 edition of the Ron Paul report newsletter described former Rep. Barbara Jordan, D-Houston, as “the archetypal half-educated victimologist, yet her race and sex protect her from criticism.”

Benton said that even though the writings appeared under Paul’s name, the articles were written by others without Paul’s approval. Benton said Paul was “especially upset with the Barbara Jordan comments because he respected her and liked her.” Jordan died in 1996.

Libertarian at heart

A number of Paul’s writings underscore his libertarian leanings.

While Paul does not talk about legalizing drugs on the campaign trail, he wrote in 1988 during his bid for president on the Libertarian ticket that “all drugs should be decriminalized.”

In recent years Paul has criticized the war on drugs but largely directed his ire at what he argues is the government’s zeal in going after physicians who prescribe drugs for pain management.

http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/A-look-at-Ron-Paul-s-controversial-past-1843810.php

More proof that Ron Paul does not value equal rights for minorities.

More proof that Ron Paul does not value equal rights for minorities. 

Ron Paul has sponsored legislation that would repeal affirmative action, keep the IRS from investigating private schools who may have used race as a factor in denying entrance, thus losing their tax exempt status, would limit the scope of Brown versus Board of Education, and would deny citizenship for those born in the US if their parents are not citizens. Here are links to these bills: H.R.3863H.R.5909H.J.RES.46, and H.J.RES.42.

Article: Why Ron Paul Is Wrong About Impeaching President Obama.

If offering Dennis Kucinich a seat in the cabinet was not enough to make you think Ron Paul was needing more naps the latest headline grabbing stunt should settle any lingering doubts about the Texan Congressman’s electability.

Not for the first time does this blog challenge Congressman Ron Paul.  However, the latest gimmick from this perennial odd-ball candidate for the GOP presidential nomination is perhaps the most dangerous yet.  The facts will show why Paul is far more ready for a warm glass of milk and a medical orderly to tuck him in than any place in the Oval Office.

CONTINUED: http://dekerivers.wordpress.com/2011/10/03/why-ron-paul-is-wrong-about-impeaching-president-obama-over-the-killing-of-anwar-al-awlaki/